India Alliance JDU Nitish Kumar Not Selected Convenor Due To His Betrayal Image Congress RJD


India Alliance: Lok Sabha Elections Slowly getting closer. In such a situation, the Indian alliance is also busy in handing over their responsibilities to all the leaders. However, the biggest question is whether Nitish Kumar will ever be able to become the coordinator of the opposition alliance. This question is because this dream of his workers was broken again. There was no virtual meeting of the alliance on Wednesday nor was any decision taken on Nitish. Now the question is whether consensus is not being reached on Nitish’s name.

JDU leaders from Patna to Delhi yesterday were calling Nitish Kumar the most qualified. He was dreaming of being made the coordinator of the opposition alliance. But the day changed and the dream was shattered. The dream is broken because yesterday the news came that on January 3, the leaders of the opposition alliance will hold an online meeting and in that meeting a proposal will be made to make Nitish the convener. But neither the meeting took place nor was the proposal to make Nitish Kumar the convener.

These leaders agreed on Nitish’s name

Bihar Deputy CM Tejashwi Yadav, on the question of India Alliance’s zoom meeting, said that he has just talked to everyone. We will decide the date after talking to everyone. There needs to be a meeting etc. It is not clear yet when the meeting will take place and how it will take place. According to the information received by ABP News from sources, Akhilesh Yadav, Sharad Pawar, Uddhav Thackeray and some other leaders have given consent to Nitish’s name. No statement has come from their side yet.

Therefore, it can be assumed that the wait for Nitish and JDU workers has increased. Anyway, the wait for Nitish Kumar has been long. For the last seven months, Nitish Kumar has been dreaming of becoming the convenor of the opposition alliance and his fellow alliance partners are showing him the dream.

Nitish started the initiative of alliance

There is no doubt that Nitish Kumar had started the campaign of opposition unity. In the month of May last year, Nitish had toured across the country and started forming an alliance by meeting opposition leaders. But till now he has not got any results from this initiative of Nitish. On the contrary, in the meeting of 19th December, Mamata put forward the name of Mallikarjun Kharge.

It is even said that after this meeting itself, Nitish Kumar got angry and removed the National President of his party Lalan Singh from the post, because he had shown the dream of making Nitish the Prime Ministerial candidate.

Every big and small leader of JDU is still calling Nitish Kumar as PM material. But the rest of the alliance parties were not happy and when the news of the meeting in which Nitish was made the coordinator came out yesterday, Congress leader Meem Afalaj started calling this news a media creation.

What questions are being raised about Nitish and why?

Is unity not being formed in the opposition alliance in the name of Nitish? Does the Congress leadership not agree on Nitish’s name? Had Mamata put forward Kharge’s name only to cut Nitish’s cards? Doesn’t Kejriwal also agree on Nitish’s name?

These are some of the questions which are being discussed in the political corridor from Patna to Delhi. At present, the suspense over Nitish’s name has increased again. Now the question in your mind will be that if Nitish worked so hard for the alliance, then why is there a problem in his name.

The reason for this is the image of Nitish Kumar. Even though people know Nitish Kumar as Good Governance Babu, he has become a distrusted leader of politics. No one knows when they will turn. No one knows what will hurt them. For the last several days, there are whispers about his return to NDA. Perhaps this is the main reason why opposition parties are not able to express confidence in Nitish.

Also read: Media Creation, Congress leader Meem Afzal clarified the news of making Nitish Kumar the coordinator.



Source link

onlinenews24seven: