Education Minister Prof. Chandrashekhar Yadav.
– Photo: Amar Ujala
Expansion
In the Nitish Kumar government of Bihar, the MLAs and ministers of Rashtriya Janata Dal are continuously raising questions regarding Shri Ram Temple in Ayodhya. Recently, RJD MLA Fateh Bahadur expressed his anger by raising questions on its justification and now Education Minister from RJD quota, Prof. Chandrashekhar not only supported his words, but also went two steps ahead. Not only did he talk about choosing between temple and hospital, he also said that those who declared the value of Fateh Bahadur’s tongue and throat should know that now they will not give sacrifice like Eklavya, but will take it.
How did you support Prof. Chandrashekhar has
During his address, Education Minister Chandrashekhar asked the people that if you get injured, where will you go? Temple or hospital? If you want education and want to become an officer, MLA or MP, will you go to temple or school? MLA Fateh Bahadur Singh said the same thing which Savitribai Phule had said. What’s wrong here? He quoted Savitribai Phule. Is education not necessary?…We should beware of pseudo Hindutva and pseudo nationalism. The Education Minister said that when Lord Ram lives in each one of us and everywhere, where will you go to find him? The sites that have been allotted have been made sites of exploitation, which are used to line the pockets of some conspirators in the society. Attacking the Central Government, Professor Chandrashekhar said that anyone who speaks against social justice, education, employment and hypocrisy in the country is being announced to be rewarded by cutting the tongue and neck. So that by not talking on all these issues, the people of the country will remain uneducated by following the path of their hypocrisy and Brahminism and their rule will continue.
What did Fateh Bahadur say?
Actually, RJD MLA Fateh Bahadur Singh had given a controversial statement seven days ago. He said that the temple being built in Ayodhya. Only hypocritical and Manuwadi society can develop from that temple. Who will get employment from that temple? Denying the existence of Ayodhya, he further said that that place was Saket, Ayodhya was not there at all. Saket is the land of Gautam Buddha and Emperor Ashoka. Universities, colleges and hospitals should have been built on the land of Saket. Not only this, MLA Fateh Bahadur Singh had also given a controversial statement on Hindu Gods and Goddesses.
